TL;DR
Get everyday helpers delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Sixty and Me report presents potential, choice and purpose as three skills people can draw on while facing adversity. The article bases these themes on interviews with people who experienced loss and hardship; it does not establish that the skills guarantee recovery or happiness.
Sixty and Me has published a report identifying potential, choice and purpose as three skills that may help people cope with adversity. Drawing on interviews with people who experienced hardship and loss, the article argues that resilience can be developed, while offering personal accounts rather than evidence that these approaches work for everyone.
The report’s author says the three themes emerged from interviews with people facing different challenges and losses, a project that later became the book Living Well Despite Adversity: Inspiration for Finding Renewed, Meaning, and Joy in Your Life. The article frames resilience not as a fixed personal trait but as something that can be strengthened over time. That is the report’s central perspective, not a clinical finding established by the material provided.
Potential means resisting assumptions about what a person can do and using creativity or problem-solving to consider alternatives. The article quotes Gabriel Gordell, who traveled 3,000 miles in 99 days in a manual wheelchair: “It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.” His experience illustrates the report’s point, but it is one individual account.
Choice refers to deciding how to respond to circumstances, even when the circumstances themselves cannot be changed. The article cites Sherri Mandell, who was grieving the murder of her son, Koby. Mandell said: “Each day I have to work to go on; each day I decide to live.” The third skill, purpose, is described as finding or renewing meaning after disruption. Julia Fox Garrison, who had a near-fatal stroke at 37, said: “What I need to do is impact someone in a positive way every single day.”
How the Three Skills Frame Recovery
The report focuses on responses that may remain available when external circumstances are painful or beyond a person’s control. Its emphasis on agency and meaning can give readers a practical way to think about coping: identify possible actions, consider a different response, and look for reasons to continue or contribute. The examples also show that adaptation does not necessarily mean returning to an earlier version of oneself.
That message may be relevant to people experiencing bereavement, illness, disability or other major change. Still, the article’s interviews are illustrative, not a test of effectiveness. The three skills should not be read as a promise that hardship can be overcome through attitude alone, or as a substitute for professional support when someone needs it.
Popular right now
Dyson V8 Cyclone Cordless Vacuum
TCL QM64L 85-Inch QD-Mini LED 4K Smart Fire TV
Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grade Blender, 64 oz. Container, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Interviews Behind the Advice
The author describes a longstanding interest in how people live through challenges and says the interviews informed a book about adversity, renewal and meaning. The report connects those stories to a broader argument that circumstances do not determine long-term wellbeing on their own.
It also invokes research by psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky, assigning 10% of happiness to circumstances, 50% to genetic or hereditary factors, and 40% to intentional behavior, attitudes and beliefs. The supplied article does not identify the specific study, its methods or the qualifications attached to those proportions. They should be treated as figures cited by the report, not as a settled prediction of any individual’s wellbeing.
““It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.””
— Gabriel Gordell, as quoted in the Sixty and Me report
Limits of the Report’s Evidence
The supplied material does not provide the interview count, selection process, dates, or a method for evaluating whether the three skills improved participants’ wellbeing. It also does not identify the underlying research behind the happiness percentages or explain how broadly those figures apply. The accounts are attributed to individuals, but the article does not establish that other people will have similar experiences.
It is also unclear what the report means by “living well” in measurable terms. Its suggestions are presented as observations and coping ideas, not as a tested treatment or a guarantee of recovery. People’s needs and responses to loss or illness can differ.
Applying the Ideas to Daily Life
The report closes by inviting readers to reflect on what helps them live through challenges, whether they believe a rich life is possible alongside pain, and how they build resilience. It does not announce a follow-up study or provide a formal program. Readers can consider the three themes as prompts—what options remain, what response is possible today, and what feels meaningful—while seeking appropriate support for their circumstances.
Key Questions
What three skills does the report identify?
It names potential, choice and purpose as skills that may support coping with adversity.
Does the report prove these skills improve wellbeing?
No. The material describes interviews and personal stories, but provides no controlled study or outcome data showing that the skills cause improved wellbeing.
What does the report mean by choice?
It means focusing on how a person responds to a situation, even when they cannot control what happened. The article acknowledges that doing so may be difficult.
Where do the happiness percentages come from?
The report attributes a breakdown of 10% circumstances, 50% hereditary factors and 40% intentional behavior, attitudes and beliefs to research by psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky. The supplied material does not provide a study citation or details about the figures’ scope.
Source: sixtyandme.com
